Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sale el Sol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (and now even he's not sure) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sale el Sol[edit]
- Sale el Sol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I've been off-putting the AfD nomination but the more I think about it and the more I look at the sourcing there just isn't enough information here to justify the creation of the article. It is not notable per WP:NALBUMS because there isn't enough information for a detailed article. There is too much speculation e.g. recorded 2008-2010 and its quickly becoming a forum for speculation/recorded songs. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 16:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This article has a cover, release date, confirmed tracks and a single. Just because there isn't that much information confirmed about the making of the album, etc. that isn't a reason for deletion. I also saw that you have removed the background section a few times, which would help building up the article. —ΣПDiПG-STΛЯT (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I removed the background section because it is unsourced and WP:OR. The notability policy for albums also clearly states Separate articles should not be created until there is sufficient reliably sourced information about a future release. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 20:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This article has a cover, release date, confirmed tracks and a single. Just because there isn't that much information confirmed about the making of the album, etc. that isn't a reason for deletion. I also saw that you have removed the background section a few times, which would help building up the article. —ΣПDiПG-STΛЯT (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This article is about an upcoming album and it should not be deleted as long as we're going to have news to expand the article from now until October 19, the day of the album release. About the current situation I think it's well redacted and it stands on good references. --Quaveren (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Imminent album by notable blockbuster artist - seems clear and present enough not to be in breach of WP:CRYSTAL. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 05:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the references are good and no need for deletion.Ashishvats23 Ashishvats23 6:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC +5:30)
- Even though I nominated the article, I now agree..., it was not as hard as I thought it would be, to find reliable sources to expand the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 03:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep references about the release of this album, are now well confirmed.Too Shakira's official website confirmed the release of this album Sale el Sol. D6h !? 16:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.